<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/skins/common/feed.css?164"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Thread:Pathway Incorrect (2) - Revision history</title>
		<link>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Pathway_Incorrect_%282%29&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.13.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 16:30:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Sham.uk: New page:  I've worked on immune and interferon signaling for years and STAT2 isn't activated by IFNg signaling. STAT2 and ISGF3 complex (STAT1:STAT2:IRF9) formation is unique to type I IFN signalin...</title>
			<link>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Pathway_Incorrect_%282%29&amp;diff=107314&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;New page:  I've worked on immune and interferon signaling for years and STAT2 isn't activated by IFNg signaling. STAT2 and ISGF3 complex (STAT1:STAT2:IRF9) formation is unique to type I IFN signalin...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt; I've worked on immune and interferon signaling for years and STAT2 isn't activated by IFNg signaling. STAT2 and ISGF3 complex (STAT1:STAT2:IRF9) formation is unique to type I IFN signaling IFNa/b).  &lt;br /&gt;
I've looked at the paper this pathway is based on and  I think they made a mistake.  STAT2 can be a transcriptional target of IFNG but is never a part of the signaling cascade.&lt;br /&gt;
I guess one of the biggest weaknesses of community derived pathway resources is that lack of evidence/provenance for each link between molecules in the signaling cascade.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:27:03 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Sham.uk</dc:creator>			<comments>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php/Thread_talk:Pathway_Incorrect_%282%29</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>