<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/skins/common/feed.css?164"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Thread:Nice work! (4) - Revision history</title>
		<link>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Nice_work%21_%284%29&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.13.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 13:44:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Khanspers: New page: This looks good, but I think it should be split into two pathways. The title for each can reflect the difference in quantitative vs qualitative gain of metastatic traits.  Also, the specie...</title>
			<link>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Nice_work%21_%284%29&amp;diff=86196&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;New page: This looks good, but I think it should be split into two pathways. The title for each can reflect the difference in quantitative vs qualitative gain of metastatic traits.  Also, the specie...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This looks good, but I think it should be split into two pathways. The title for each can reflect the difference in quantitative vs qualitative gain of metastatic traits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the species name should not be included in the pathway title.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:42:56 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Khanspers</dc:creator>			<comments>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php/Thread_talk:Nice_work%21_%284%29</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>