AlexanderPico: New page: It's fine to keep the labels and identifiers just as you have them. But the datanode type should be changed from "Protein" to "Gene Product". This sort of discrepancy won't make a differen...

AlexanderPico — Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:09:53 GMT

New page: It's fine to keep the labels and identifiers just as you have them. But the datanode type should be changed from "Protein" to "Gene Product". This sort of discrepancy won't make a differen...

New page

It's fine to keep the labels and identifiers just as you have them. But the datanode type should be changed from "Protein" to "Gene Product". This sort of discrepancy won't make a different to human readers of the pathway, but when we try to submit this pathway to Pathway Commons and it's converted to BioPAX and other exchange formats it will be rejected simply because Entrez Gene IDs don't specific "Protein". Let me know if any of this is still unclear. Happy to help! [[User:AlexanderPico|AlexanderPico]] 18:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Thread:«no subject» (29) - Revision history

AlexanderPico: New page: It's fine to keep the labels and identifiers just as you have them. But the datanode type should be changed from "Protein" to "Gene Product". This sort of discrepancy won't make a differen...