<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/skins/common/feed.css?164"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3AQualifying_for_Analysis_Set_%281%29</id>
		<title>Thread:Qualifying for Analysis Set (1) - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3AQualifying_for_Analysis_Set_%281%29"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Qualifying_for_Analysis_Set_%281%29&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-20T20:51:25Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.13.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Qualifying_for_Analysis_Set_%281%29&amp;diff=62364&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>AlexanderPico: New page: This is great pathway. However, the color coding limits its utility in data visualization and analysis applications. If you were to shift the coloring to the borders or even just remove it...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Qualifying_for_Analysis_Set_%281%29&amp;diff=62364&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2013-04-27T23:47:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: This is great pathway. However, the color coding limits its utility in data visualization and analysis applications. If you were to shift the coloring to the borders or even just remove it...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is great pathway. However, the color coding limits its utility in data visualization and analysis applications. If you were to shift the coloring to the borders or even just remove it, then this pathway would immediately qualify for distribution in our Analysis and GenMAPP approved sets. That is, other researcher would see and use it.  If you were to add a literature reference, it would also qualify for the Featured Set and be shown on the front page from time to time. [[User:AlexanderPico|AlexanderPico]] 23:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlexanderPico</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>