<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/skins/common/feed.css?164"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ANice_new_version_%282%29</id>
		<title>Thread:Nice new version (2) - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ANice_new_version_%282%29"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Nice_new_version_%282%29&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-21T09:04:29Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.13.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Nice_new_version_%282%29&amp;diff=83813&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>AlexanderPico: New page: Hi Georg,  I like this new streamlined version of TCA, but same comments made for FAO apply here as well:  (1) The &quot;streamlined&quot; title is not ideal. It's too dependent on the legacy of the...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Nice_new_version_%282%29&amp;diff=83813&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-12-11T21:48:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: Hi Georg,  I like this new streamlined version of TCA, but same comments made for FAO apply here as well:  (1) The &amp;quot;streamlined&amp;quot; title is not ideal. It's too dependent on the legacy of the...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Hi Georg,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like this new streamlined version of TCA, but same comments made for FAO apply here as well:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) The &amp;quot;streamlined&amp;quot; title is not ideal. It's too dependent on the legacy of the other pathway rather than on the actual biological process differences. Can you think of distinct titles for these two pathways that focus on the biology? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) The homology comment should not be copied to this version. Referencing the original TCA pathway is enough. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AlexanderPico|AlexanderPico]] 21:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>AlexanderPico</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>