https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3AInteresting_new_pathway_%281%29Thread:Interesting new pathway (1) - Revision history2026-06-20T17:10:22ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.13.1https://oldclassic.wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Thread:Interesting_new_pathway_%281%29&diff=50098&oldid=prevMaintBot: New page: It's great to see new unique content. But I noticed that none of the molecules in the pathway are defined as gene, proteins or metabolites. This is one of the main strengths of WikiPathway...2012-08-07T18:36:01Z<p>New page: It's great to see new unique content. But I noticed that none of the molecules in the pathway are defined as gene, proteins or metabolites. This is one of the main strengths of WikiPathway...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>It's great to see new unique content. But I noticed that none of the molecules in the pathway are defined as gene, proteins or metabolites. This is one of the main strengths of WikiPathways, to support objects that can mapped to datasets. Check out the videos in the Help section and try using the Gene, Pro, and Met object types (double-click on them to activate a search tool to help define each using standard identifiers). Let me know if you need help. [[User:MaintBot|AlexanderPico]] 18:36, 7 August 2012 (UTC)</div>MaintBot